The Commerce Department will impose anti-dumping duties on China pipe exports at an average rate of 25.67 percent. Individual company margins for China producers range from zero to 51.34 percent. These anti-dumping duties are in addition to the anti-subsidy duties imposed by the DOC on Nov. 6, 2007, when it was determined that the government of China was illegally subsidizing pipe makers.

Circular welded steel pipe products, known as standard and structural pipe, are used in plumbing applications, HVAC systems, sprinkler systems, fencing and construction.

The pipe imports subject to the petition against China have surged from 10,000 tons in 2002 to more than 750,000 tons in 2007 -- a 6,900 percent increase. The result has been the loss of 500 American jobs, or about 25 percent of the total work force employed in this segment of the domestic pipe industry.

Once the new tariffs are published in the Federal Register, typically within five days, importers will be required to post bonds in the amount of the dumping margins calculated by Commerce. The DOC has also applied critical circumstances, determining that this duty could be applied retroactively by 90 days.

The trade suit, filed in parallel with the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the DOC on June 7, 2007 by the ‘Ad Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe Imports From China and the United Steelworkers.’ The coalition includes: Allied Tube & Conduit, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Northwest Pipe Company, Sharon Tube Company, Western Tube & Conduit Corporation, and Wheatland Tube Company. On July 20, 2007, the ITC made a finding that circular welded pipe from China is causing material injury to the U.S. industry.

Leo W. Gerard, USW International President, declared, “This is an important decision today for domestic pipe and steel workers. We have seen significant layoffs in the pipe and tube industry as a result of skyrocketing China imports. Chinese producers sell at prices that vastly undercut U.S. companies, meaning lost sales, lost jobs, and closed facilities. The ripple effects are enormous, as thousands of steel jobs have also been lost in the mills that supply steel to the pipe and tube producers, particularly in the Ohio Valley.”

Armand Lauzon, Chief Executive Officer of John Maneely Company (parent company of Wheatland Tube and Sharon Tube), said, “This important decision sends a strong message to Chinese producers that they cannot dump their excess production in our market. This has cost the industry both jobs and revenue, and we hope these provisional duties will put a stop to that.” Rick Filetti, President of Allied Tube & Conduit, stated, “Surging imports from China at prices below our raw material costs have had a significant adverse impact on our employees and on our company’s profitability. Dumping erodes both market share and pricing of U.S. producers who have done much to increase their own competitiveness over the past three years, but who cannot compete with dumped and subsidized product from China.”

Gilbert B. Kaplan, a partner at King & Spalding, one of the law firms representing the pipe makers, said: “We are gratified that the Department of Commerce recognized the significant unfair trade practices engaged in by the Chinese pipe producers. These duties should have an important effect on the strength of the United States pipe industry.”

Roger Schagrin, of Schagrin Associates, also representing the petitioners, added: “This is an important day for the U.S. pipe industry and its workers, which until now has been forced to compete against dumped imports. Today’s decision is an important first step in the process of obtaining trade relief against unfairly traded imports from China.”

After the DOC makes final determinations in both the anti-subsidy duty and anti-dumping duty investigations, the ITC is scheduled to complete its final investigation in the spring of 2008.